Horse
Sense
By Sparky Imeson 
It has been circulated about the aviation community that there is no
such thing as ‘horse sense’ — common sense — when it comes to the
operation of an airplane.
Think about it. The definition of common sense is “the
unreflective opinions of ordinary people forming sound and prudent but
often unsophisticated judgment.”
Judgment, then, is “the process of forming an opinion or evaluation by
discerning and comparing.”
It is important to the pilot that discerning and prioritizing is done in
a manner consistent with the problem that he is trying to resolve.
When a judgment is acted upon by intuition, the situation often goes
astray. We know that some aviation activities do not lend themselves to
intuition, for example, the spin. When the airplane enters a spin, you
would swear the nose is pointing straight down. Intuition screams, “Pull
up the nose.” But we know this prolongs the stalled condition allowing
the airplane to continue to spin. In this case it is wise to set aside
the intuitive reaction and resort to a conditioned reflex of relaxing
the back pressure (or making a brisk forward movement of the control
wheel) to fly out of the resulting dive.
Judgment may also be dealt with as factual knowledge, not wishful
thinking. Deduction may be more useful in solving a particular dilemma,
for example, mechanical failure of the engine, un-forecast weather
conditions and fuel shortage. An analysis of the particular event leads
to solving the problem.
It is necessary to prioritize during any predicament. If the engine has
failed, the first priority is to fly the airplane. Next we search for a
suitable landing area. And finally we troubleshoot, trying the mixture,
throttle and mags. If these don’t work in solving the problem, the
airplane is flown to a suitable landing area and the forced landing
executed.
Un-forecast weather conditions may present more of a dilemma for the
pilot. This is especially true if he doesn’t have the experience of
dealing with the various weather conditions to the extent that he can
predict their likely outcome, such as continued deterioration of the
ceiling and/or visibility. Analysis by an inexperienced pilot should
first involve the 180-degree turn. If the weather conditions continue to
degrade, land at the nearest suitable airport, and study what is going
on from the safety of the ground.
Value judgment
Some pilots try to ignore the reality of a situation. When running short
of fuel they try to justify continuing toward the destination by
reasoning that they did the preflight planning and there has to be
enough fuel.
They justify the cognitive decision to continue because of their
empirical factual knowledge of the fuel burn and the time they have
flown. Although the fuel gauges show ‘empty,’ they continue discounting
the common sense that a fuel cap may not be seated allowing a slow
siphoning of the reserve or ignoring the possibility of a drain being
stuck open. In this case the pilot’s capacity for forming an opinion or
evaluation by discerning and comparing has been reduced to wishful
thinking.
Often the novice pilot, compared to the experienced pilot, is more
successful in dealing with unexpected contingencies. They do not have
the experience necessary to become complacent.
For example, the experienced pilot may get caught in the trap of
continued VFR flight into adverse weather conditions; whereas the novice
will turn tail and head for an alternate airport at the first sign of
unacceptable ceiling or visibility. Remember the successful outcome of
scud running — intentionally flying during adverse weather such as a low
ceiling or reduced visibility condition — demands that the pilot develop
rules pertaining to his minimum ceiling and visibility for continuing
flight. Otherwise, he too, makes the 180-degree turn, or puts the
airplane on the ground.
Outcome
Whether you are out practicing takeoffs and landings in a 20-knot
crosswind, flying in canyons and valleys, or flying cross country, it is
imperative that you think ahead of the airplane and play the “what if”
game. “What if” the engine fails? “What if” I experience a downdraft as
I approach a ridge? “What if” the weather turns sour?
Develop a plan of action, such as diversion to an alternate, to deal
promptly and effectively with these questions.
In other words, use common sense.
Definitions
Consider the following definitions when someone tells you there is no
such thing as common sense actions in an airplane.
SENSE
- the faculty of perceiving by means of sense organs as sight, hearing,
smell, taste, or touch, basically involving a stimulus and a sense
organ, the sensory mechanisms constituting a unit distinct from other
functions such as movement or thought.
ASSESSMENT
- the action or an instance of assessing, to determine the importance,
size, or value of.
VALUE JUDGMENT
- a judgment assigning a value (as good or bad) to something.
ESTIMATE
-
means to judge something with respect to its value, worth or
significance. It implies a judgment, considered or casual, that precedes
or takes the place of actual measuring or counting or testing out
*estimated the crowd at two hundred*
EVALUATE
- suggests an attempt to determine relative or intrinsic worth or value
in terms other than monetary. Evaluate is to determine the significance,
worth, or condition of a situation by careful appraisal and study.
ASSESS
- implies a critical appraisal for the purpose of understanding or
interpreting, or as a guide in taking action.
PERSPICACITY
- of acute mental vision or discernment.
SAGACIOUSNESS
- of keen and farsighted penetration and judgment.
Sparky
Imeson has received the FAA Northwest Region's Flight Instructor of the
Year award in 1974, 1979 and 1995, for providing effective and creative
flight and ground instruction. Of his 19,200+ flight hours, the majority
have been in small airplanes in the mountains. He had written 19 books,
most on mountain flying. His new book “Taildragger” has just become
available. To contact Sparky you may go to his website –
www.mountainflying.com or email him at
sparky@fly-low.com.
|